- Case Report
- Open Access
A rare case of the scaphocephalic skull of an adult male
Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences volume 12, Article number: 44 (2022)
Scaphocephaly is a craniofacial anomaly where the skull is disproportionately long and narrow. Premature closure of the sagittal suture is thought to be at the core of the etiopathology for scaphocephaly.
The skull is a well-preserved skull found in an antiquated graveyard at Parkand village Daregaz, Iran, with no visible signs of surgical manipulation. The craniofacial indices were measured. The maximum cranial length was 200 mm, and the measured length of nasion-bregma was 140mm, whereas most of the measurements were less than the normal scaphocephalic indices. Another morphological finding was the flattening of the frontal bone.
The cranial vault morphometry and morphology of the presented case fit the scalp. In addition to the characteristics of scaphocephaly, the presented skull was of a rare trait, frontal flattening, which has not been reported before.
The skull is the most complex bony structure in the human body. It is composed of the neurocranium and viscerocranium bones which ossify in quite different modes. The calvarial bones are formed through intramembranous ossification. At the sutural sites of cranial bones, osteoprogenitor cells differentiate into bone-forming osteoblasts in a synchronous time-dependent manner ( Luo et al. 2017). During post-natal life, sutures remain open and allow the harmonious growth of the skull and the developing brain (Morriss-Kay and Wilkie 2005). Premature fusion or closure of one or more sutures, craniosynostosis, interrupts the coordinated growth of the skull and leads to morphological craniofacial anomalies. Craniosynostosis might be classified depending on the underlying mechanism, presence of other disorders, or number of fused sutures (Kajdic et al. 2018). Studies have shown that the cumulative prevalence of craniosynostoses has increased significantly with no obvious cause (Cornelissen et al. 2016). It is thought both environmental factors (e.g., intrauterine fetal head constraint, abnormal position, oligohydramnios, prenatal exposures to teratogens, maternal smoking, and anti-epileptic drugs) and genes (single-gene mutations, chromosome abnormalities, and polygenic background) may all be predisposing factors for the craniosynostosis (Kajdic et al. 2018). Based on the typical features, various types of craniosynostoses have been described.
One of the most frequent forms of craniosynostosis is scaphocephaly (Captier et al. 2005). The term scaphocephaly refers to the condition where the skull is disproportionately long and narrow (Skrzat et al. 2014). Premature closure of the sagittal suture is thought to be at the core of the etiopathology for scaphocephaly (Brah et al. 2020). It is the most common form of isolated craniosynostosis, accounting for 40–60% of single-suture synostosis (Jane Jr et al. 2000; Thwin et al. 2015). Studies have provided evidence that craniosynostosis is associated with a higher risk of impaired cognitive development, neurological disorders, and psychological disturbances (Aldridge et al. 2017; Bellew and Chumas 2015; Adamo and Pollack 2010). Although nowadays, adults with dolichocephalic skulls are rarely observed because of advances in prenatal diagnosis and surgical interventions, the study of cranial morphology remains an active field of inquiry in bioarchaeology. The present case is an adult scaphocephalic skull with unique characteristics, frontal flattening, which has not been reported before. We measured the cranial indices and compare them with the previous reports.
The skull (without mandible) was found in an antiquated graveyard at Parkand village, 10 km from Daregaz, North Khorasan Province. Dargaz County is located in the northeastern Iranian Plateau, near to borders of Turkmenistan. The skull was found accidentally among the roots of a dried tree. Due to climatic erosion and drought, the roots of the tree were exposed. The skull was buried deeply among roots. There was no sign of a burial ceremony including shroud and weapons. Soil and dried roots were gently removed. Further extraction revealed no remains of the bony skeleton. Unfortunately, the skull chronology is unknown. Sexing was determined by the evaluation of the morphology of the bones of the skull. Prominent superciliary arches, well-developed temporal lines, and a large mastoid process outweigh in favor of a male character of the investigated skull (Nagare et al. 2018). The skull was gently cleaned with a soft brush and examined with a magnifier. There were no signs of sutural fusion with the exception of the anterior part of the sagittal suture. In this study, direct anthropometric measurement techniques were taken by the researcher. Basic anthropological measurements were taken directly on the skull using appropriate instruments including flexible tape and a sliding caliper (Weber et al. 2008). Cranial measurements performed on the dolichocephalic skull are shown in Table 1. All anthropometric measurements were performed on the examined skull by three experts and then compared to the previously reported adult male dolichocephalic skulls (Skrzat 1999).
The most striking features of the examined dolichocephalic skull were the extremely narrow and long cranium. In norma verticalis, the investigated skull showed half-fused sagittal sutures and non-obliterated coronal and lambdoid sutures. In turn, the frontal norma of the examined skull presented a highly sloped frontal squama, a long and narrow face (Figs. 1, 2, 3, and 4). The maximum cranial length (g-op=200mm) was 11.1mm longer than the mean normative value (188.9mm). The maximum cranial breadth (eu-eu=120mm) was significantly decreased in comparison with the normal dolichocephalic skulls (eu-eu = 136.9mm). The minimum frontal breadth (ft-ft =80mm) was 17mm smaller than the mean of normal dolichocephalic skulls (ft-ft = 17mm). The parietal chord (b-l =100 mm) was 17.8 mm shorter than the normal dolichocephalic skulls (b-1 =117.8mm). The occipital chord (l-o =80 mm) was17.5 mm shorter than the reference skulls (l-o =97.5 mm). The biggest difference was related to the frontal chord (n-b = 140mm) in comparison to the mean of the reference skulls (115mm). Both the arch length of (b-l =116mm) and arch length (l-o =105 mm) were smaller than the reported mean values (117.8mm and 97.5mm, respectively). The arc length (n-b) was smaller than those of the mean normative value. The ratio between (ba-b) and maximum cranial breadth (eu-eu) was greater than the mean of the dolichocephalic skulls (125 vs 101, ratio 23.2). The bizygomatic diameter (zy-zy =110mm) also revealed another significant contrast in comparison to the reference value (129.8mm) (Table 2).
Craniosynostosis is a condition where premature closure of one or more cranial sutures results in abnormal craniofacial morphology as well as neurocognitive deficits (Heuzé et al. 2010). Craniosynostosis can occur primarily and secondarily. It is believed that developmental error during embryogenesis leads to primary craniosynostosis whereas metabolic disorders such as hypothyroidism, teratogens, and some genetic syndromes result in secondary craniosynostosis. More than 80% of primary craniosynostosis cases occur as an isolated condition (Kim et al. 2016). Scaphocephaly is the most common form of isolated craniosynostosis in which restriction of growth perpendicular to the sagittal suture results in an elongated and narrow cranium (Governale 2015). The examined scaphocephalic skull is of unknown historical and ethnical origin, and due to technical limitations, we were unable to take the advantage of radiometric dating technique. We believe the results of this study can be noticeable in archeological and biomedical aspects. First, from an archeological aspect, artificial modification of the human skull corresponds to the period between 45,000 B.C.E and 600 C.E (Khudaverdyan 2011).
Studies have shown that skull modification was a prevalent cultural practice in the prehistoric era. At least 27 skulls have been reliably defined as having been artificially modified in the West of Iran. It seems that the practice of artificial skull modification was most likely restricted to certain members of the community or even gender distinction as the skulls found in Ali Koš (Marcus 1993).
It is noteworthy to mention that Iranian prehistoric artificially modified skulls have been recovered from the West of Iran, while there are few documented studies about such practice in the northeast of Iran. Thus, any conclusion about the similarity between this case and previous reports should be taken cautiously. With respect to the location of the buried skull, it may likely raise the sacrificial ritual issue or crime scene. According to the study, sacrificial ritual in ancient Iran was restricted to animals (Ghalekhani and Bushehri 2016), but at present, we could not eliminate the possibility of the criminal act. From a biomedical aspect, the craniofacial measurements and indices of the present skull provide an excellent example of scaphocephaly. The maximum cranial length of the present skull indicates the anteroposterior compensatory expansion that in turn may affect the length of the parietal and occipital bones. The parietal and occipital chords were smaller than those of reference scaphocephalic skulls, while the frontal chord was significantly larger than the reference value. Interestingly, the sagittal suture was semi-obliterated, while premature closure of the sagittal suture and coronal suture compensatory mechanism has been known as the main players of morphological changes in scaphocephaly (White et al. 2021). The presented scaphocephalic skull does not manifest frontal and occipital knobs which are the typical symptoms of scaphocephaly. Additionally, the maximum cranial breadth and viscerocranium breadth were smaller than the mean reference values (17mm and 16.9mm smaller than those of the reference, respectively). The results of this study are in line with the previous reports. For instance, Skrzat et al. (2014) reported a scaphocephalic skull with a maximum cranial length of 201 mm. In another study, Weber et al. (2008) measured 18 scaphocephalic skulls and the mean maximum cranial length was 203mm. The reported values are nearly close to our scaphocephalic skull. The development and growth of the skull is a complex process that is controlled and regulated by a wide variety of biological processes including ecology, locomotion, diet, behavior, climate, and genes (Chico 2011). For instance, studies have provided evidence that mutation in the Homeobox containing transcription factor MSX2, FGF1,2,3, and helix-loop-helix transcription factor TWIST leads to craniosynostosis (Rice et al. 2003). From an evolutionary perspective, it has been postulated that the number of skull bones follows a general trend toward the reduction in the number of individual parts, resulting from losses and fusion of bones (Williston’s law) ( Ascarrunz et al. 2019). Although the investigated skull presents a scaphocephalic skull, the most striking and unique feature is the frontal bone external shape that has not been reported in previous studies. Contrary to the normal scaphocephalic skulls, the present skull is of a flattened frontal bone (frontal flattening). This finding may be partially explained by artificial modification with hand-shaping (Bronfin 2001; Meikelejohn et al. 1992) or as a feature of a genetic disorder. Considering our technical limitations on the one hand and lack of any burial evidence on the other hand, the distinction between artificial modification and other possible causes is infeasible. From an evolutionary perspective, frontal flattening is one of the most significant morphological features of mid-Pleistocene fossil hominids and Neanderthal when compared to the more vertical modern median-sagittal profile (Bookstein et al. 1999). Admittedly, we are unable to verify such an assumption because of the following reasons: first, the investigated skull is of unknown historical origin, and second, craniosynostosis is also caused by a metabolic disorder, hematologic disorder, and gene mutation (Lattanzi et al. 2017). Therefore, without radiometric dating and the medical history of the investigated skull, any conclusion should be taken cautiously. According to Virchow’s law, malformation found in scaphocephaly includes elongation of anteroposterior (frontal-occipital) diameter and shortening of biparietal diameter (Chico 2011) as we reported here. Such dynamic changes in the skull would affect the external features of the skull bone particularly the frontal and occipital bones. Various forms of the frontal bone shape comprising bilateral and rectangular, normal, or semisphere have been reported in scaphocephaly (Chico 2011). Interestingly, the frontal bone of the examined skull presents another, flattened frontal bone, and variant. One of the possible explanations for the falttened frontal bone could be the semi-obliterated sagittal suture. In other words, premature obliteration of the anterior half of the sagittal suture interrupts the normal coordinated growth of the skull, leading to the shortened occipital chord ( as measured in the present case) and finally compensatory anteroposterior elongation of the skull. This finding may accentuate the importance of the external feature of the frontal bone in neuroarcheologic studies as Bookstein’s study showed. He compared the frontal bone profiles in Archaic and modern humans. The results of their study revealed substantial external differences between the Archiac and modern samples. These differences were mainly confined to the squamous part of the frontal bone (Bookstein et al. 1999). Accordingly, skull growth could affect the underlying developing brain and subsequently cognitive capabilities. It has been shown that craniosynostosis affects the cortical and subcortical structures (Shim et al. 2016). Additionally, premature closure of the cranial sutures may lead to abnormalities in the cerebral topography (Aldridge et al. 2017). For instance, the narrowing of the posterior area of the brain and constriction of the brain between the left Sylvian fissure and left Rolandic fissure have been reported by Aldridge et al. (2017). It has been also documented that sagittal synostosis is associated with an increased risk of Chiari malformation (Strahle et al. 2011). Furthermore, other studies have provided evidence that children with sagittal synostosis demonstrate reading comprehension and language problems (Kapp-Simon et al. 2016; Shim et al. 2016). It should be noted that it would not be tenable to generalize such neurological disorders to all scaphocephalic cases. So we assume the investigated skull was the subject of our study belongs to a person with a healthy mental condition.
Here, we reported a scaphocephalic skull with frontal flattening which has been less noticed. The present case represents a relatively rare finding in anthropology and paleopathology, but these data must be interpreted with caution because of our technical and methodological limitations. With respect to the lack of skeleton remains as seen in this case, taking advantage of advanced technologies including genetic profile analysis, radiometric dating technique, imaging, and more archeologic excavation particularly in northeastern Iran is recommended.
Availability of data and materials
The authors confirm that the material of this study is available in the Anatomy Department.
Maximum cranial length
Maximum cranial breadth (eu-eu)
Minimum frontal breadth
Upper facial height
Adamo MA, Pollack IF (2010) A single-center experience with symptomatic postoperative calvarial growth restriction after extended strip craniectomy for sagittal craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr 5(1):131–135. https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.8.PEDS09227
Aldridge K, Collett BR, Wallace ER, Birgfeld C, Austin JR, Yeh R, Feil M, Kapp-Simon KA, Aylward EH, Cunningham ML, Speltz ML (2017) Structural brain differences in school-age children with and without single-suture craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr 19(4):479–489. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.9.PEDS16107
Ascarrunz E, Sánchez-Villagra MR, Betancur-R R, Laurin M (2019) On trends and patterns in macroevolution: Williston’s law and the branchiostegal series of extant and extinct osteichthyans. BMC Evol Biol 19(1):117. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-019-1436-x
Bellew M, Chumas P (2015) Long-term developmental follow-up in children with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr 16(4):445–451. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.3.PEDS14567
Bookstein F, Schäfer K, Prossinger H, Seidler H, Fieder M, Stringer C, Weber GW, Arsuaga JL, Slice DE, Rohlf FJ, Recheis W, Mariam AJ, Marcus LF (1999) Comparing frontal cranial profiles in archaic and modern homo by morphometric analysis. Anat Rec 257(6):217–224 (https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(19991215)257:6<217::AID-AR7>3.0.CO;2-W)
Brah TK, Thind R, Abel DE (2020) Craniosynostosis: clinical presentation, genetics, and prenatal diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol Surv 75(10):636–644. https://doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0000000000000830
Bronfin DR (2001) Misshapen heads in babies: position or pathology? Ochsner J 3(4):191–199
Captier G, Bigorre M, Rakotoarimanana JL, Leboucq N, Montoya P (2005) Etude des variations morphologiques des scaphocéphalies. Implication pour leur systématisation [Study of the morphologic variations of the scaphocephaly. Deduction for their systematisation]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 50(6):715–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anplas.2005.06.001
Chico PLF (2011) Craniosynostosis. I. Biological basis and analysis of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex 68(5):333–348 [citado 13 March 2022]
Cornelissen M, den Ottelander B, Rizopoulos D, van der Hulst R, van der Molen AM, van der Horst C, Delye H, van Veelen ML, Bonsel G, Mathijssen I (2016) Increase of prevalence of craniosynostosis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 44(9):1273–1279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2016.07.007/bjbms.2017.2083
Ghalekhani G, Bushehri LF (2016) The analysis of sacrificial rituals in Iran based on Avesta and Pahlavi texts. Int Lett Soc Human Sci 73:29–41
Governale LS (2015) Craniosynostosis. Pediatr Neurol 53(5):394–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2015.07.006
Heuzé Y, Boyadjiev SA, Marsh JL, Kane AA, Cherkez E, Boggan JE, Richtsmeier JT (2010) New insights into the relationship between suture closure and craniofacial dysmorphology in sagittal nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. J Anat 217(2):85–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2010.01258.x
Jane JA Jr, Lin KY, Jane JA Sr (2000) Sagittal synostosis. Neurosurg Focus 9(3):e3. https://doi.org/10.3171/foc.2000.9.3.4
Kajdic N, Spazzapan P, Velnar T (2018) Craniosynostosis - recognition, clinical characteristics, and treatment. Bosn J Basic Med Sci 18(2):110–116. https://doi.org/10.17305/bjbms.2017.2083
Kapp-Simon KA, Wallace E, Collett BR, Cradock MM, Crerand CE, Speltz ML (2016) Language, learning, and memory in children with and without single-suture craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr 17(5):578–588. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.9.PEDS15238
Khudaverdyan A (2011) Artificial modification of skulls and teeth from ancient burials in Armenia. Anthropos 106(2):602–609 JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/23031634
Kim HJ, Roh HG, Lee IW (2016) Craniosynostosis: updates in radiologic diagnosis. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 59(3):219–226. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2016.59.3.219
Lattanzi W, Barba M, Di Pietro L, Boyadjiev SA (2017) Genetic advances in craniosynostosis. Am J Med Genet A 173(5):1406–1429. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.38159
Luo F, Xie Y, Xu W, Huang J, Zhou S, Wang Z, Luo X, Liu M, Chen L, Du X (2017) Deformed skull morphology is caused by the combined effects of the maldevelopment of calvarias, cranial base and brain in FGFR2-P253R mice mimicking human apert syndrome. Int J Biol Sci 13(1):32–45. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.16287 PMID: 28123344; PMCID: PMC5264259
Marcus M (1993) Incorporating the body: adornment, gender, and social identity in ancient Iran. Camb Archaeol J 3(2):157–178
Meikelejohn C, Agelarakis A, Akkermans PA, Smith PEL, Solecki R (1992) Artificial cranial deformation in proto-neolithic and Neolithic near east and its possible origin: evidence from four sites. Paléorient 18(2):83–97 http://www.jstor.org/stable/41492492
Morriss-Kay GM, Wilkie AO (2005) Growth of the normal skull vault and its alteration in craniosynostosis: insights from human genetics and experimental studies. J Anat 207(5):637–653. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2005.00475.x
Nagare SP, Chaudhari RS, Birangane RS, Parkarwar PC (2018) Sex determination in forensic identification, a review. J Forensic Dent Sci 10(2):61–66. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfo.jfds_55_17
Rice DP, Rice R, Thesleff I (2003) Molecular mechanisms in calvarial bone and suture development, and their relation to craniosynostosis. Eur J Orthod 25(2):139–148. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/25.2.139
Shim KW, Park EK, Kim JS, Kim YO, Kim DS (2016) Neurodevelopmental problems in non-syndromic craniosynostosis. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 59(3):242–246. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2016.59.3.242
Skrzat J (1999) Anatomical and anthropological study of the human skulls from Wolhynia and Podolia [in Polish]. PhD. Thesis – Jagiellonian University, Cracow
Skrzat J, Stepańczak B, Walocha J (2014) The scaphocephalic skull of an adult male. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 73(1):92–98. https://doi.org/10.5603/FM.2014.0014
Strahle J, Muraszko KM, Buchman SR, Kapurch J, Garton HJ, Maher CO (2011) Chiari malformation associated with craniosynostosis. Neurosurg Focus 31(3):E2. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.6.FOCUS11107
Thwin M, Schultz TJ, Anderson PJ (2015) Morphological, functional and neurological outcomes of craniectomy versus cranial vault remodeling for isolated nonsyndromic synostosis of the sagittal suture: a systematic review. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep 13(9):309–368. https://doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2470
Weber J, Collmann H, Czarnetzki A, Spring A, Pusch CM (2008) Morphometric analysis of untreated adult skulls in syndromic and nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. Neurosurg Rev 31(2):179–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-007-0100-x
White HE, Goswami A, Tucker AS (2021) The intertwined evolution and development of sutures and cranial morphology. Front Cell Dev Biol 9:653579. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.653579
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
We, the undersigned, give our consent for the publication of identifiable details, which can include photograph(s) and/or videos and/or case history and/or details within the text (“Material”) to be published in EJFS. I confirm that I have seen and been given the opportunity to read both the material and the article (as attached) to be published by EJFS. We have discussed this consent form with Dr. Shahriar Ahmadpour who is the corresponding author of this paper. I understand that EJFS may be available in both print and on the internet and will be available to a broader audience through marketing channels and other third parties. Therefore, anyone can read material published in the Journal. I understand that readers may include not only medical professionals and scholarly researchers but also journalists and general members of the public.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Ahmadpour, S., Foghi, K. A rare case of the scaphocephalic skull of an adult male. Egypt J Forensic Sci 12, 44 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-022-00303-4
- Frontal flattening