Skip to main content

Advertisement

Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences
Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences Cover Image
We’d like to understand how you use our websites in order to improve them. Register your interest.
Download PDF

Accuracy of the cutoff value of the third molar maturity index: an Egyptian study

Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences volume 9, Article number: 52 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to test the sensitivity and specificity of the third molar maturity index (I3M) cutoff value to discriminate between individuals above and below 18 years of age in an Egyptian sample.

Material and methods

Digital images of 247 orthopantographs (97 boys and 150 girls) were evaluated. The cutoff value of I3M obtained from the results of Cameriere et al. (Int J Legal Med 122:493–497, 2008) was evaluated in both girls and boys.

Results

Sensitivity (the proportion of individuals being 18 years of age or older) was 95% and 73% in boys and girls, respectively. Meanwhile, specificity (the proportion of individuals younger than 18) was 100% in boys and 97% in girls. The proportion of correctly classified boys was 97% while it was 59% in girls.

Conclusion

It can be concluded that the third molar maturity index can discriminate between individuals who are 18 years and over and those under 18 with higher accuracy in boys.

Background

The age of 18 is the age of legal responsibility. This is important especially with the increased illegal migration. Many illegal African immigrants pass to Europe through Egypt. Illegal immigrants tend to lack reliable documents since they either lose them or even destroy them. The Egypt’s state statistics agency (CAPMAS) report said that many children in the age range 10–17 were married and 93.4% of them were girls, a violation of Egyptian laws which the government aims to combat (ahramonline accessed 11 June 2019). So, providing suitable legal procedures reflecting the transition from childhood to maturity and full criminal responsibility is an important issue in criminal justice (De Luca et al. 2016). That is why forensic age estimation of living individuals is a very important tool to overcome deliberate falsification of age in medicolegal and criminal cases (Cameriere et al. 2015; Gupta et al. 2015).

Teeth development as a mean to evaluate age in children has the advantage of being in a uniform manner from infancy to late adolescence. It is under strong genetic control and shows less environmental influences compared to skeletal maturation (Franklin et al. 2015).

The third molar development assessment is usually applied for those aged 13–23 years (Galic et al. 2015). For estimating the age of 18, Cameriere et al. (2008) published a method that depends on the assessment of the relation between age and the third molar maturity index (I3M). They found that a cutoff value of 0.08 in Italian population showed 70% sensitivity and 98% specificity. It has been tested in many populations and showed high sensitivity and specificity (Deitos et al. 2015; Galic et al. 2015; De Luca et al. 2016). No studies until now have assessed such method on the Egyptian population. So, we aimed to test the sensitivity and specificity of this cutoff value to discriminate between Egyptian individuals above and below 18 years of age.

Material and methods

Sample

A sample of 259 orthopantographs (OPGs) from Egyptian subjects aged 13–24 was analyzed. This cross-sectional study collected OPGs at random from the digital archive of the Mansoura University, Faculty of Dentistry, during years 2015 and 2017, as well as from private dental clinics, following the ethical standards laid down by the Declaration of Helsinki (2013) and was approved by Mansoura University IRB (code: R.18.11.345). Exclusion criteria were dental pathology affecting the lower left jaw and unknown date of birth.

Following the initial sampling, 12 OPGs were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria, leaving 247 OPGs (97 boys and 150 girls). The digital images were evaluated using an open-source image computer-aided drafting program used to process and analyze digital images (Digimizer Image Analysis program).

Assessment of the third molar maturity index (I3M)

The left lower third molar was examined using the I3M index described in the study by Cameriere et al. (2008) where if the apices of the third molar are completely closed, then I3M = 0. Otherwise, the distance between the inner sides of the open apex, i.e., apical distance (AD) of mandibular left third molars, was measured and divided by the tooth length (L). If the tooth had two roots (ADa and ADb), the sum of these distances was divided by the tooth length (L) (Fig. 1). Measurements were carried out by two different observers.

Fig. 1
figure1

Measurements of a tooth with one root (a) and two roots (b) where AD apical distance, L length

Full size image

Twenty randomly selected OPGs were assessed to check for inter-observer reliability and were re-examined after a month interval for intra-observer reliability.

Statistical analysis

A Microsoft Excel file was used in this study to register the identification number, gender, chronological age, and I3M value. The cutoff value of 0.08 for I3M for both genders, obtained from the results of Cameriere et al. (2008), was evaluated. An individual is considered to be 18 years of age or older if I3M is lower than 0.08. The sensitivity of the test (i.e., the proportion of subjects > 18 years of age who have I3M < 0.08) together with specificity (i.e., the proportion of individuals younger than 18 who have I3M > 0.08) was evaluated.

According to Bayes’ theorem, post-test probability was written as

$$ \mathrm{PPV}=\frac{\mathrm{Se}\ {p}_0}{\mathrm{Se}\ {p}_0+\left(1-\mathrm{Sp}\right)\left(1-{p}_0\right)} $$

where positive predictive value (PPV) is the positive predictive value and p0 is the prevalence of Egyptian subjects aged between 18 and 24 years of age among all subjects aged between 13 and 24 years old (the studied sample) who live in Egypt based on the demographic data retrieved from Egypt Demographics Profile (2018). The estimated prevalence for girls is 59% and 60% for boys.

Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to test the intra-observer and inter-observer agreement between the two observers. To evaluate intra-observer and inter-observer agreement between both observers, Cohen’s kappa was used.

Results

Age distribution of the sample is shown in Table 1. Individuals < 18 years were 100 (42 boys and 58 girls) while those ≥ 18 years were 147 (55 boys and 92 girls). The mean chronological age of boys and girls were 18.85 ± 3.61 years and 19.11 ± 4.16 years, respectively. The minimum age at which complete maturation (union of apices) of the third molar (I3M = 0) was noticed to be 20.07 years for girls and 19.44 years for boys.

Table 1 Sample of panoramic radiographs from Egyptian individuals according to sex and age categories
Full size table

The validity of I3M presenting the number of individuals who have I3M ≥ 0.08 and I3M < 0.08 and those who are younger than 18 and those not younger than 18 is shown in Tables 2 and 3.

Table 2 Contingency table of the cutoff value’s performance for girls (n, 150)
Full size table
Table 3 Contingency table of the cutoff value’s performance for boys (n, 97)
Full size table

The close association between adult age and positivity of the test (i.e., I3M < 0.08) in girls is shown in Table 2. It was found that 123 out of 150 (82% (95% CI 76–88)) were correctly classified. The sensitivity of the test was 73% (95% CI 64–82) and its specificity was 97% (95% CI 92–100). The PPV was 59%.

Table 3 displays the close association between adult age and the positivity of the test in the boys. From 97 individuals, 94 were accurately classified (97% (95% CI 93–100)). The sensitivity of the test was 95% (95% CI 89–100) and the specificity was 100%. The PPV was 60%.

The ICC for intra-rater and inter-rater agreement of I3M was 98.7% (95% CI 98.4–99.2) and 97.8% (95% CI 96–98.2), respectively. Cohen’s kappa for intra-rater and inter-rater agreement was 0.93 and 0.86.

Discussion

It is important to discriminate minors from adult especially in the absence of documents to avoid criminal violations (Deitos et al. 2015). From this point of view, methods used for age estimation applied in forensic medicine must be accurate, precise, and well-validated before application (Rivera et al. 2017).

The estimation of dental age in Egyptians was reported in previous studies (El-Bakary et al. 2010; Zaher et al. 2011; El Morsi et al. 2015; Wahdan et al. 2017). But, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first Egyptian study that validates the use of the third molar maturity index cutoff value of 0.08 to discriminate those aged 18 years or older from minors (less than 18 years).

In his original study, Cameriere et al. (2008) evaluated the I3M in OPGs of 906 Caucasian Italian individuals aged between 14 and 23 years (53.6% females and 46.4% males). The cutoff value of 0.08 showed 70% sensitivity and 98% specificity with 83% correct classification. This cutoff value was tested in many populations around the world and showed high sensitivity and specificity although percentages were different.

Results of this Egyptian sample showed relatively faster development (earlier complete maturation of the third molar) in boys. Generally, many studies showed male precedence of the third molar development, e.g., Hispanics (Solari and Abramovitch 2002), Japanese (Olze et al. 2004), Serbian (Zelic et al. 2016), and Saudi (AlQahtani et al. 2017). Nevertheless, females were reported to show faster development of third molars in one study (Liversidge 2008).

When the cutoff value of “I3M = 0.08” was evaluated in the present study (247 cases), the high sensitivity (Se) of the test in boys (95%) but relatively lower sensitivity in girls (73%) was documented. Sensitivity values were reported to be over 95% in Turkish males (128 boys from 293 total sample) (Gulsahi et al. 2016), Colombians (288 children), (De Luca et al. 2016), and Serbians (598 cases) (Zelic et al. 2016). Meanwhile, it was 88% in Botswana (1294 individuals) (Cavrić et al. 2016) and 90% in Australians (143 cases) (Franklin et al. 2016). Unfortunately, sensitivity was only 52% in the Saudi population (300 cases) (AlQahtani et al. 2017).

Meanwhile, a high specificity (Sp) of the cutoff value (100% in boys and 97% in girls) was found in the present sample. On the other hand, specificity was 100% in the Turkish study (Gulsahi et al. 2016) and in Saudi males (AlQahtani et al. 2017), and over 85% in Colombians (De Luca et al. 2016), Serbians (Zelic et al. 2016), Botswana (Cavrić et al. 2016), and Australian population (Franklin et al. 2016).

It seems that values of sensitivity and specificity of the present study are more in boys ensuring previous published data in Serbians (Zelic et al. 2016). On the other hand, girls showed more values in a Colombian study (De Luca et al. 2016).

Different sensitivity and specificity in these populations may be either due to actual differences between them or differences in the age distribution and sample size, as well as dissimilarity among observers. However, the examination of the third molars may provide reasonable accuracy for the likelihood that a person is at least 18 years old (Acharya et al. 2014).

In the present Egyptian sample, the proportion of correctly classified persons was 97% in boys and 82% in girls, even better than 83% reported by Cameriere et al. (2008). More or less similar proportions of correctly classified individuals were reported in Turkish (97.6% for boys and 92.7% in girls) (Gulsahi et al. 2016), Serbians (95% in males and 91% in females) (Zelic et al. 2016), and Chileans (83%) (Cameriere et al. 2018).

Meanwhile, the positive predictive value (PPV) in the present Egyptian sample was 60% in boys and 59% in girls. Although the PPV is highly useful, it is sensitive to the prevalence of the positive test group (older age category) and can rarely be generalized beyond the study sample (Gulsahi et al. 2016). In a legal and forensic context, it is ethically safer to underestimate age than to overestimate age due to constitutional and judicial implications when involving a possible adult (Cavrić et al. 2016).

Technically, unacceptable errors can be detected if an adult was wrongly diagnosed as a minor (less than 18 years). They will get the full benefit of safeguarding through being children in care. However, if the reverse occurs and a minor was diagnosed as over 18 years, this is an ethically unacceptable error as it leads to violation of minors’ rights (Garamendi et al. 2005).

In the context of estimating a person’s age, none of the techniques can be used with high reliability when the person has completed his growth. However, from the legal point of view, it is often enough to indicate whether a person is an adult or a minor (Schmeling et al. 2008).

Conclusion

In conclusion, the third molar maturity index can discriminate between individuals who are 18 years and over and those under 18 with higher accuracy in boys than girls. As the present findings are in correlation with findings for other populations, the I3m cutoff value is justifiable to be used in medicolegal practice.

Availability of data and materials

Data supporting our findings can be found with the corresponding author. Data will not be shared, as it contains personal information. Please contact the author for data requests.

Abbreviations

I3M :

Third molar maturity index

ICC:

Intra-class correlation coefficient

OPGs:

Orthopantographs

PPV:

The positive predictive value

Se:

Sensitivity

Sp:

Specificity

References

  1. Acharya AB, Bhowmik B, Naikmasur VG (2014) Accuracy of identifying juvenile/adult status from third molar development using prediction probabilities derived from logistic regression analysis. J Forensic Sci 59(3):665–670

  2. AlQahtani S, Kawtharb A, AlAraikb A, AlShalanb A (2017) Third molar cut-off value in assessing the legal age of 18 in Saudi population. Forensic Sci Int 272:64–67

  3. Cameriere R, De Luca S, Cingolani M, Ferrante L (2015) Measurements of developing teeth and carpals and epiphyses of the ulna and radius for assessing new cut-offs at the age thresholds of 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 years. J Forensic Legal Med 34:50–54

  4. Cameriere R, Ferrante L, De Angelis D, Scarpino F, Galli F (2008) The comparison between measurement of open apices of third molars and Demirjian stages to test chronological age of over 18 year olds in living subjects. Int J Legal Med 122:493–497

  5. Cameriere R, Velandia Palacio LA, Pinares J, Bestetti F, Paba R, Coccia E, Ferrante L (2018) Assessment of second (I2M) and third (I3M) molar indices for establishing 14 and 16 legal ages and validation of the Cameriere’s I3M cut-off for 18 years old in Chilean population. Forensic Sci Int 285:205.e1–205.e5

  6. Cavrić J, Galić I, Vodanović M, Brkić H, Gregov J, Viva S, Rey L, Cameriere R (2016) Third molar maturity index (I3M) for assessing age of majority in a black African population in Botswana. Int J Legal Med 130:1109–1120

  7. Declaration of Helsinki (2013) WMA Declaration of Helsinki–Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/.

  8. De Luca S, Aguilar L, Rivera M, Velandia Palacio LA, Riccomi G, Bestetti F, Cameriere R (2016) Accuracy of cut-off value by measurement of third molar index: study of a Colombian sample. Forensic Sci Int 261:160.e1–160.e5

  9. Deitos AR, Costa C, Michel-Crosato E, Galić I, Cameriere R, Biazevic MG (2015) Age estimation among Brazilians: younger or older than 18? J Forensic Legal Med 33:111–115

  10. Egypt Demographics Profile (2018), https://www.indexmundi.com/egypt/demographics_profile.html. Accessed 15 Sept 2018

  11. El Morsi D, Rezk H, Aziza A, El-Sherbiny M (2015) Tooth coronal pulp index as a tool for age estimation in Egyptian population. J Forensic Sci Crimino 3:201–208

  12. El-Bakary AA, Hammad SM, Mohammed F (2010) Dental age estimation in Egyptian children, comparison between two methods. J Forensic Legal Med 17(7):363–367

  13. Franklin D, Flavel A, Noble J, Swift L, Karkhanis S (2015) Forensic age estimation in living individuals: methodological consideration in the context of medico-legal practice. Res Rep Forensic Med Sci 5:53–66

  14. Franklin D, Karkhanis S, Flavel A, Collini F, De Luca S, Cameriere R (2016) Accuracy of a cut-off value based on the third molar index: validation in an Australian population. Forensic Sci Int 266:575.e1–575.e6

  15. Galic I, Lauc T, Brkić H, Vodanovic M, Galic E, Biazevic MG, Brakus I, Badrov J, Cameriere R (2015) Cameriere’s third molar maturity index in assessing age of majority. Forensic Sci Int 252:191–195

  16. Garamendi PM, Landa MI, Ballesteros J, Solano MA (2005) Reliability of the methods applied to assess age minority in living subjects around 18 years old. A survey on a Moroccan origin population. Forensic Sci Int 154:3–12

  17. Gulsahi A, De Luca S, Cehreli SB, Tirali RE, Cameriere R (2016) Accuracy of the third molar index for assessing the legal majority of 18 years in Turkish population. Forensic Sci Int 266:584.e1–584.e6

  18. Gupta S, Mehendiratta M, Rehani S, Kumra M, Nagpal R, Gupta R (2015) Age estimation in Indian children and adolescents in the NCR region of Haryana: a comparative study. J Forensic Dent Sci 7(3):253–258

  19. Liversidge HM (2008) Timing of human mandibular third molar formation. Ann Hum Biol 35:294–321

  20. Olze A, Taniguchi M, Schmeling A, Zhu BL, Yamada Y, Maeda H et al (2004) Studies on the chronology of third molar mineralization in a Japanese population. Legal Med 6:73–79

  21. Rivera M, De Luca S, Aguilar L, Velandia Palacio LA, GaliI CR (2017) Measurement of open apices in tooth roots in Colombian children as a tool for human identification in asylum and criminal proceedings. J Forensic Legal Med 48:9–14

  22. Schmeling A, Grundmann C, Fuhrmann A, Kaatsch HJ, Knell B, Ramsthaler F et al (2008) Criteria for age estimation in living individuals. Int J Legal Med 122:457–460

  23. Solari AC, Abramovitch K (2002) The accuracy and precision of third molar development as an indicator of chronological age in Hispanics. J Forensic Sci 47:531–535

  24. Wahdan AA, Lashin HI, Elborae MO (2017) Estimation of age using mandibular permanent first molars in panoramic radiographs in a sample of Egyptian population, Mansoura. J Forens Med Clin Toxicol 25(2):1–12

  25. Zaher JF, Fawzy IA, Habib SR, Ali MM (2011) Age estimation from pulp/tooth area ratio in maxillary incisors among Egyptians using dental radiographic images. J Forensic Legal Med 18:62–65

  26. Zelic K, Galic I, Nedeljkovic N, Jakovljevic A, Milosevic O, Djuric M, Cameriere R (2016) Accuracy of Cameriere’s third molar maturity index in assessing legal adulthood on Serbian population. Forensic Sci Int 259:127–132

Download references

Acknowledgements

None

Funding

This research was not financially supported by any organization.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Forensic Medicine and Clinical Toxicology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt
    • Amal A. El-Bakary
    •  & Somaia M. El-Azab
  2. Radiology Department, Student’s Hospital, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
    • Heba M. Abou El Atta
  3. AgEstimation Project, University of Macerata, Macerata, Italy
    • Luz Andrea Velandia Palacio
    •  & Roberto Cameriere
Authors
  1. Amal A. El-Bakary
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  2. Somaia M. El-Azab
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  3. Heba M. Abou El Atta
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  4. Luz Andrea Velandia Palacio
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  5. Roberto Cameriere
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in

Contributions

AAE-B contributed to the idea of the research and the study design, collecting of the data, rating of panoramas, and writing and publishing the article. SME-A shared in the rating of panoramas and writing the research. HMAEA shared in the rating of panoramas. VPLA contributed to the statistical analysis and shared in writing the paper. RC contributed to the statistical analysis and revised the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amal A. El-Bakary.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted in Mansoura University, Egypt, and approved by Mansoura University IRB (code: R.18.11.345).

Consent for publication

This study does not include publishing of personal data.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

El-Bakary, A., El-Azab, S.M., Abou El Atta, H.M. et al. Accuracy of the cutoff value of the third molar maturity index: an Egyptian study. Egypt J Forensic Sci 9, 52 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-019-0156-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Adolescents
  • Dental age estimation
  • Egyptians
  • Third molar maturity index (I3M)