Skip to main content

Advertisement

  • Original Article
  • Open Access

Genetic Architecture of Southeast-coastal Indian tribal populations: A Y-chromosomal phylogenetic analysis

Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences20199:30

https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-019-0132-8

  • Received: 8 June 2018
  • Accepted: 30 April 2019
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Y chromosome single nucleotide polymorphisms (Y-SNPs) are useful markers for reconstructing male lineages, haplogroup determinations, and paternity identifications. Since Y chromosome lacks recombination, the haplogroups of this series show a greater extent of diverse genome-specific geographical distributions and these haplogroups have been found to play a major role in forensic investigations and population genetics.

Materials and methods

The present study is aimed at determining the Y chromosomal phylogeny of two southeast coastal Indian tribal populations (Porja and Savara; N = 217), using a set of 15 bi-allelic markers on the non-recombining region of Y chromosome, representing two Austro-Asiatic (AA) language speaking populations.

Results and conclusions

The phylogenetic analysis revealed four paternal haplogroups, viz., H1*-M52, H1a*-M82, O2a*-M95, and R2-M124, with high frequency (84.79%) represented by the Austro-Asiatic-specific haplogroup O2a* (M95), confirming to the fact of O2a* haplogroup being the paternal signature of AA language family of Southeast Asians.

Keywords

  • Forensic sciences
  • Forensic genetics
  • Phylogeny
  • Haplogroups
  • Bio-geography
  • Ancestors

Background

DNA evidence has turned into an influential tool in forensic sciences for resolving cases in relating a suspect to a scene of crime, determining issues regarding biological relationships, and recognizing victims of mass disasters. The development of DNA expertise has supplemented diverse areas, utilization of DNA evidence through Y-SNPs, Y chromosome—short tandem repeats (Y-STRs), and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), bringing in immense possibilities in assisting the criminal justice system. Due to its uniqueness among the other human chromosomes, Y chromosome haplogroups or haplotypes have been used for the identification of criminals in forensic cases (Jobling et al. 1997), paternal lineages in human evolution (Jobling and Tyler-Smith 1995), diseases in medical genetics (Jobling and Tyler-Smith 2000), and pedigrees in genealogical reconstructions (Jobling 2001). Although forensic genetics covers a broad range of disciplines, such as forensic pathology (Alacs et al. 2010), complex traits (Kayser and Schneider 2009; Pulker et al. 2007), and wild life forensics (Budowle et al. 2005), nowadays, in the field of forensic genetics, short tandem repeats (STRs)-centered DNA testing (Edwards et al. 1992) has been accepted as a principal approach used in cases of naïve paternity investigations (ZupanicPajnic et al. 2001), identification of skeletal remains (ZupanicPajnic et al. 2010), and complex criminal cases, involving rape and gang rape. STRs occupy nearly 3% of the total human genome and are present once in every 10,000 nucleotides on an average (Butler 2005). Multiplexing facilitates the use of these markers in forensic anthropology and medicolegal studies. At present, a number of laboratories conduct STR analysis while studying population genetics and report them in various ethnic populations (Tandon et al. 2002; Sarkar and Kashyap 2002; Sahoo and Kashyap 2002; Gaikwad and Kashyap 2002; Rajkumar and Kashyap 2002; Narkuti et al. 2008; Dubey et al. 2008; Giroti and Talwar 2010; Ghosh et al. 2011; Chaudhari and Dahiya 2014; Shrivastava et al. 2015; Shrivastava et al. 2016; Jain et al. 2017; Imam et al. 2017). However, in spite of being the most consistent and frequently utilized genetic markers in forensics, STRs have some drawbacks, which undermine their efficacy. STRs deliver precise results on well-preserved bone and soft tissue samples. The size of amplification necessary for STR testing is too high (150–450 bp) to permit practical amplification of fragmented DNA templates.

Compared to a monotonous STR-centered DNA profiling, SNP markers provide a valuable and progressively additional important information. SNPs provide an infinite cradle of human genome diversity for testing (Cooper et al. 1985; Wang et al. 1998). SNP profiling as a tool for DNA detection presents some benefits over and above the usage of STR markers (Sinha et al. 2017).

Y chromosome phylogeny (phylogeography) studies can be done by using bi- or multi-allelic markers (Jobling and Tyler-Smith 2000; Y Chromosome Consortium 2002). The largest non-recombining region (NRY) of DNA and different stable markers in the human Y chromosome makes it a perfect marker for use in evolutionary studies. Due to their high geographic specificity, Y-SNP haplogroups can be used to understand admixture and stratification between populations (Jobling and Tyler-Smith 2003). Greater mutational stability and higher mutation rate of Y chromosome SNPs make it advantageous when typing with highly degraded DNA (Thomson et al. 2000; Sobrino et al. 2005; Chakraborty et al. 1999). The Y chromosome haplogroup O-M175 is an important marker for eastern and Southeastern Asia, as it covers the most ubiquitous Y chromosome lineage, covering about 75% of mainland China (Su et al. 1999) and 87% of Southeast Asia (Karafet et al. 2005; Li et al. 2008; Karafet et al. 2010; Delfin et al. 2011 and He et al. 2012). Y chromosome haplogroup O-M175 is present in 84.79% of the studied population and is significantly important, as it is the most ubiquitous Y lineage in mainland India, China, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Vietnam (Southeast Asian populations) (Karafet et al. 2008).

Many Indian studies have reported frequencies of Y chromosome haplogroups in varying ethnic and language speaking tribes and castes (Kumar et al. 2007; Sharma et al. 2012; Khurana et al. 2014; Singh et al. 2016). The findings in the abovementioned studies dissects the Y chromosomal haplogroup pool and are helpful in understanding the current genetic scenario of Indian populations. With the findings of the abovementioned studies in background, the present study was conducted on two important indigenous tribal populations of South India—Porja and Savara.

Porja population is mainly distributed near the hill slopes of Munchingputtu, Anantagiri, and Peddabayalu regions of Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh (AP), India. They migrated from Odisha to the present habitat about 300 years back. Savara population can be seen in Lakaiguda, Mettiguda, Chintalaguda, and Manduguda regions of Srikakulam, AP, India. Savara language is included in the Kol Munda group of Austro-Asiatic language family.

Materials and methodology

Sampling area

To investigate the genetic architecture of southeast coastal Indian populations of Porja and Savara tribes hailing from Visakhapatnam and Srikakulam districts of Andhra Pradesh, 217 blood samples were collected from healthy and unrelated male individuals belonging to them. The habitat of studied population groups is shown in Fig. 1. The present study was carried under the national project “DNA Polymorphisms” of Anthropological Survey of India, Kolkata. The ethical committee of Anthropological Survey of India has approved the present study.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Map of India highlighting Andhra Pradesh (left); sample collection area (right)

Sample collection and DNA extraction

After obtaining individual informed consent from volunteer donors, 5 ml of blood sample was drawn by a trained medical practitioner of Primary Health Centre (PHC) of affiliated villages in EDTA-coated vacutainers and transported to the DNA Laboratory of Anthropological Survey of India, Southern Regional Centre at Mysore, Karnataka, India, for further extraction and analysis. The DNA extraction was done by phenol-chloroform method (Phenol-Chloroform Isoamyl Alcohol (PCI) DNA Extraction 1998) and quantified using UV-visible spectrophotometer (Perkin-Elmer) at A 260/280 nm.

PCR and sequencing

A set of 15 bi-allelic SNP markers was analyzed to identify the Y chromosome haplogroups using sets of primers as described elsewhere (Karafet et al. 2008). The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) cyclic conditions for specific primers were standardized in the DNA Lab, Anthropological Survey of India, Southern Regional Centre at Mysore, Karnataka, India. The initial denaturation was performed at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, at an annealing temperature for specific primers at 51–58 °C, extension at 72 °C for 2 min 30 s, and final extension at 72 °C for 7 min. The generated amplified products were directly sequenced using Big Dye™Terminator Cycle Sequencing kit in the ABI prism 3730 DNA Analyzer (Applied Bio-Systems, USA).

Statistical analysis

The sequences which were generated were aligned with the individual reference sequences using SeqScape software V2.5 (Applied Bio-Systems, USA). For assigning Y chromosome binary haplogroups, the revised Y chromosome phylogenetic tree was referred (Karafet et al. 2008).

Results and discussion

Among the 217 male individuals under study, we observed four different haplogroups (H1*, H1a*, O2a*, and R2) in the studied samples, out of which O2a* accounted for 84.79% (42.86% in Porja and 41.94% in Savara population) (Table 1) (Fig. 2). The remaining three haplogroups R2, H*, and H1a* revealed low frequencies in both the studied populations. Their frequencies ranged from 1.38 to 3.69%, which is consistent with previous studies of Southeast Asian populations (Karafet et al. 2005; Li et al. 2008; Karafet et al. 2010; Delfin et al. 2011; He et al. 2012 and Karafet et al. 2008). The detailed description of each haplogroup is presented below.
Table 1

Y haplogroup distribution of the studied populations (Porja and Savara)

Haplogroups

Y-SNPs

Porja (POJ)

Frequency

Savara (SAV)

Frequency

Total

Total frequency

111

106

H1*

M52

6

2.76

4

1.84

10

4.61

H1a*

M82

5

2.30

3

1.38

8

3.69

O2a*

M95

93

42.86

91

41.94

184

84.79

R2

M124

7

3.23

8

3.69

15

6.91

Total

111

51.15

106

48.85

217

100

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Phylogenetic distribution of Y-SNPs in 217 South Indian individuals (present study). The observed frequencies are shown at the right side of each sub-haplogroup along with the 16 different tribal populations from the adjoining neighbor states

Haplogroup O

Haplogroup O identified by M175 (5-bp deletion) was found with highest frequency of 84.79%. It possibly originated in East Asia (Karafet et al. 2008) and then migrated to South Asia Pacific. Paternal signature of haplogroup O can be traced at moderate or low frequencies in some parts of Central Asia and Oceania (Cai et al. 2011; Karafet et al. 2001; Underhill et al. 2001 and Deng et al. 2004). Haplogroup O is further divided into three sub-clades which are defined by the presence of O1-MSY 2.2, O2-P31, and O3-M122. Although the most frequent sub-clade observed in the present study was O2a*, it occurs with a frequency of 42.86% in Porja and 41.94% in Savara. O2a lineages are found in Southeast Asian populations of Malaysia, Vietnam, Indonesia, and Southern China (Sengupta et al. 2006).

Haplogroup R

Haplogroup R is characterized by M207 and is further segregated into two sub-clades R1, which is identified by M173 A>C allele, and R2, identified by M124 C>T allele. This haplogroup R1-M173 is estimated to have arisen during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) and is likely to be found in Southwestern Asia (Zhao et al. 2009), which is believed to have arisen 27,000 years ago in Asia. In the present study, haplogroup R2 lineage is present in 3.23% and 3.69% of Porja and Savara population respectively.

Haplogroup H

Haplogroup H is identified by M69 T>C allele. It is further divided into two sub-clades H1 which is identified by M52 A>C allele and H2 which is identified by APT G>A allele. Because of the high frequency of the H haplogroup in Indian tribal groups, it is often regarded as the original Indian haplogroup belonging to be the ancient settlers. We found the presence of H1* and H1a* in the present studied samples in low frequencies, about 4.61% and 3.69% respectively. Haplogroup H has also been reported from Central Asia, Western Asia, and Europe (Wells et al. 2001; Regueiro et al. 2006). The low frequency of H1* and H1a* in the present study is possibly due to their higher frequency among the Dravidian speaking tribes of South India and their presence in the remaining parts of the Indian subcontinent is limited (Thomson et al. 2000; Li et al. 2008; Zhao et al. 2009; Cordaux et al. 2004).

Phylogenetic analysis

Figure 3 presents the MDS plot based on Y (SNPs) haplogroup frequencies showing that Birja (AA), Juang (AA), Santhal (AA), and Ho (AA) tribes are more closely related to the present studied population groups, viz., Porja and Savara, showing closer genetic affinity between them. Among the two language groups, Austro-Asiatic and Dravidian, all the AA populations show critically closer genetic affinities with Porja and Savara. Yerukula and Chenchu as well as Naikpodgond form different clusters in the multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) (Fig. 1), which is probably due to the absence of O2a haplogroups (Table 1) which is specific to AA linguistic groups. In the same cluster except Nagesia population (DR), the rest of the DR cluster populations, viz., Oraon, Paharia, Naikpodgond, Chenchu, Yerukula, are distant from the presently studied populations probably because of the lack of frequency of O2a haplogroup. The Porja DR population show closer affinity with other AA populations possibly due to admixture or gene flow towards the Austro-Asiatic populations. In general, samples from the present study and the previous reference samples with the same linguistic or ethnic affiliations tended to be closer in the MDS plot, although there were a few variations.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Genetic relationships of populations based on Ø/ST distances estimated from Y chromosome haplogroup frequencies. AA Austro-Asiatic, DR Dravidian. Present studied samples (Savara and Porja) are compared with the data set of Vikrant et al. 2007

In the MDS plot (Fig. 4) based on the Y chromosomal (SNPs) frequencies of Porja and Savarafrom AP, Odisha fell indifferent clusters showing differences between the two populations from two different locations of India, probably due to genetic differences and low frequency of O2a haplogroup. Savara samples from AP (present study) are forming different cluster, whereas samples from Jharkhand, Odisha, and West Bengal are forming a different cluster due to the genetic differences among the populations and lesser frequency of O2 haplogroup in the samples from Odishha, West Bengal, and Jharkhand.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Genetic relationships of populations based on Ø/ST distances estimated from Y chromosome haplogroup frequencies. AP Andhra Pradesh, OR Orissa, WB West Bengal, JH Jharkhand. Present studied samples (Savara and Porja) from AP are compared with the data set of Vikrant et al. 2007

In the present study, we examined the genetic components of two populations from Southern India to identify their origin and the genetic similarity levels in the present day scenario. We further explored if any sub-populations, sub-lingual, socio-cultural affiliations, or gender-based demographic patterns influenced the genes or geneticity of these population groups. In this study, 217 individuals were typed for Y chromosome polymorphisms using a set of 15 bi-allelic markers on the non-recombining region of Y chromosome, which might be affected in an insignificant bias against some of the rare lineages. Despite the sample size limitation in the studied samples and reference samples from the border areas of Andhra Pradesh, the diversity in Y chromosome lineages suggested that the genetic pool of Andhra Pradesh especially tribal populace is composed of genes that have known phylogeographic origins in Europe and Southeast Asia, while their Y chromosomes show evidence of traces of the original inhabitants of the continent.

Conclusion

The distribution of Y-SNP haplogroups from the present studied populations will increase the resolution power of haplogroups and can play a crucial role in assigning geographical identity to these individual haplogroups, and make determination of the bio-geography of southeast coastal Indians an easy process. However, while applying the data of these haplogroups in Forensic cases, good number of populations should be analyzed with different markers and the individuality of geographic landmarks should be compared with the different haplogroups’ distribution. These Y chromosomal SNP haplotypes show characters similar to some of the mainland haplogroups. The data generated above can be used to find the patrilineal roots of the tested haplogroups. This information about Y chromosomal haplogroups and haplotypes is restricted to the tested population but can provide conclusive data for understanding the patrilineal bio-geography ancestry especially in disaster victim identifications (DVI). The different branches of Y chromosome tree have massive relationship with geographical areas which make it effectively capable of delivering the route map for the ancestors as Y-SNP markers depict association of ethnicity and geography with particular haplogroup frequencies. These Y-SNP markers have established their efficacy in identifying cases, but these uni-parental SNP markers are very less known for being helpful in identifying geographical ancestry although the SNP markers for DVI have now been utilized in a major case of disaster, i.e., the terrorist attack of 11 September 2001 on the World Trade Center (WTC) at New York City because STRs were too long for heavily degraded sample analysis. Finally, Y-SNPs, for their 100,000-times lower mutation rate in contrast to STRs, are superior for kinship testing and may replace STRs for such purposes once commercial kits become available.

Abbreviations

AA: 

Austro-Asiatic

AP: 

Andhra Pradesh

LGM: 

Last Glacial Maximum

MDS: 

Multi-dimensional scaling

mtDNA: 

Mitochondrial DNA mtDNA

NRY: 

Non-recombining region

PCR: 

Polymerase chain reaction

PHC: 

Primary Health Centre

Y-SNPs: 

Y chromosome single nucleotide polymorphisms

Y-STRs: 

Y chromosome-short tandem repeats

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to all the participants who voluntarily participated for this study on “DNA Polymorphisms” and provided their blood samples. We wish to thank the Director Anthropological Survey of India for granting the ethical clearance to carry out the work.

Funding

Funding was obtained from the Anthropological Survey of India.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author research work.

Authors’ contributions

ARI performed the wet lab analysis and prepared the overall manuscript. MS contributed in the study by making the structuring of the research paper. VP contributed in the sample collection and wet lab and dry lab analysis. AC designed the overall study and incorporated the wet lab and dry lab analysis. BA reviewed the complete manuscript and helped in preparing the “Results” section. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Written informed consent was obtained from all the participants for this study. The ethical committee of Anthropological Survey of India duly approved the present study under the national project “DNA Polymorphisms”.

Consent for publication

All the authors have given the written consent for publication of this article.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Forensic Science, Guru Ghasidas University, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, 495009, India
(2)
Anthropological Survey of India, Eastern Regional Centre, Kolkatta, India
(3)
Anthropological Survey of India, Southern Regional Centre, Mysore, India

References

  1. Alacs EA, Georges A, Fitzsimmons NN, Robertson J (2010) DNA detective: a review of molecular approaches to wildlife forensics. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 6(3):180–194PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Budowle B, Garofano P, Hellman A, Ketchum M, Kanthaswamy S, Parson W, van Haeringen W, Fain S, Broad T (2005) Recommendations for animal DNA forensic and identity testing. Int J Legal Med 119:295–302PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Butler JM (2005) Constructing STR multiplex assays. Methods Mol Biol. 297:53–66PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cai Q, Wen W, Qu S, Li G, Egan KM, Chen K, Deming SL, Shen H, Shen CY, Gammon MD (2011) Replication and functional genomic analyses of the breast cancer susceptibility locus at 6q25. 1 generalize its importance in women of Chinese, Japanese, and European ancestry. Cancer research. 71:1344–1355PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Chakraborty R, Stivers DN, Su B, Zhong Y, Budowle B (1999) The utility of short tandem repeat loci beyond human identification: implications for development of new DNA typing systems. Electrophoresis 20:1682–1696PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Chaudhari RR, Dahiya MS (2014) Genetic diversity of 15 autosomal short tandem repeats loci using the AmpFLSTR(®) Identifiler™ kit in a Bhil Tribe Population from Gujarat state, India. Indian J Hum Genet. 20(2):148–152PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooper DN, Smith BA, Cooke HJ, Niemann S, Schmidtke J (1985) An estimate of unique DNA sequence heterozygosity in the human genome. Hum. Genet. 69:201–205PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Cordaux R, Aunger R, Bentley GR, Nasidze I, Sirajuddin SM, Stoneking M (2004) Independent origins of Indian caste and tribal paternal lineages. Curr Biol 14:231–235PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Delfin F, Salvador JM, Calacal GC, Perdigon HB, Tabbada KA, Villamor LP, Halos SC, Ttir EG, Myles S, Hughes DA, Xu S, Jin L, Lao O, Kayser M, Hurles ME, Stoneking M, Ungria MC (2011) The Y-chromosome landscape of the Philippines: extensive heterogeneity and varying genetic affinities of Negrito and non-Negrito groups. Eur J Hum Genet 19:224–230PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Deng W, Shi B, He X, Zhang Z, Xu J, Li B, Yang J, Ling L, Dai C, Qiang B, Shen Y, Chen R (2004) Evolution and migration history of the Chinese population inferred from Chinese Y-chromosome evidence. J Hum Genet 49:339–348PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Dubey B, Ramakodi MP, Eaaswarkhanth M, Vasulu TS, Haque I (2008) Forensic STR profile of two endogamous populations of Madhya Pradesh. India. Legal Medicine 11(1):41–44PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Edwards A, Hammond HA, Jin L, Caskey CT, Chakraborty R (1992) Genetic variation at five trimeric and tetrameric tandem repeat loci in four human population groups. Genomics 12(2):241–253PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Gaikwad S, Kashyap VK (2002) Polymorphism at fifteen hypervariable microsatellite loci in four populations of Maharashtra. India. Forensic Science International 126(3):267–271PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Ghosh T, Kalpana D, Mukerjee S, Mukherjee M, Sharma AK, Nath S, Rathod VR, Thakar MK, Jha GN (2011) Genetic diversity of 17 Y-short tandem repeats in Indian population. Forensic Science International Genetics. 5(4):363–367PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Giroti R, Talwar I (2010) The Most Ancient Democracy in the World is a Genetic Isolate: An Autosomal and Y-Chromosome Study of the Hermit Village of Malana (Himachal Pradesh, India). Human Biology 82(2):123–141PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. He JD, Peng MS, Quang HH, Dang KP, Trieu AV, Wu SF, Jin JQ, Murphy RW, Yao YG, Zhang YP (2012) Patrilineal perspective on the Austronesian diffusion in Mainland Southeast Asia. PLoS One 7:e36437PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Imam J, Reyaz R, Singh RS, Bapuly AK, Shrivastava P (2017) Genomic portrait of population of Jharkhand, India, drawn with 15 autosomal STRs and 17 Y-STRs. Int J Legal Med 132(1):139–140PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Jain T, Shrivastava P, Trivedi VB (2017) Genetic portrait of Majhi tribe of Chhattisgarh, India based on 15 autosomal STRs and 23 Y-STRs. International Journal of Legal Medicine 131(1):113–114PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Jobling MA (2001) In the name of the father: surnames and genetics. Trends Genet 17:353–357PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Jobling MA, Pandya A, Tyler-Smith C (1997) The Y chromosome in forensic analysis and paternity testing. Int J Legal Med 110:118–124PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Jobling MA, Tyler-Smith C (1995) Fathers and sons: the Y chromosome and human evolution. Trends Genet 11:449–456PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Jobling MA, Tyler-Smith C (2000) New uses for new haplotypes: the human Y chromosome, disease and selection. Trends Genet 16:356–362PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Jobling MA, Tyler-Smith C (2003) The human Y chromosome: an evolutionary marker comes of age. Nat Rev Genet 4:598–612PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Karafet T, Xu L, Du R, Wang W, Feng S, Wells RS, Redd AJ, Zegura SL, Hammer MF (2001) Paternal population history of East Asia: sources, patterns, and micro-evolutionary processes. Am J Hum Genet 69:615–628PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Karafet TM, Hallmark B, Cox MP, Sudoyo H, Downey S, Lansing JS, Hammer MF (2010) Major east-west division underlies Y chromosome stratification across Indonesia. Mol Biol Evol 27:1833–1844PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Karafet TM, Lansing JS, Redd AJ, Reznikova S, Watkins JC, Surata PK, Arthawiguna A, Mayer L, Bamshad M, Jorde LB, Hammer MF (2005) Balinese Y-chromosome perspective on the peopling of Indonesia: genetic contributions from pre-Neolithic hunter-gatherers, Austronesian farmers and Indian traders. Hum Biol 77:93–114PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Karafet TM, Mendez FL, Meilerman MB, Underhill PA, Zegura SL, Hammer MF (2008) New binary polymorphisms reshape and increase resolution of the human Y chromosomal haplogroup tree. Genome Res 18:830–838PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Kayser M, Schneider PM (2009) DNA-based prediction of human externally visible characteristics in forensics: motivations, scientific challenges, and ethical considerations. Forensic Sci Int Genet 3:154–161PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Khurana P, Aggarwal A, Mitra S, Italia YM, Saraswathy KN, Chandrasekar A, Kshatriya GK (2014) Y chromosome haplogroup distribution in Indo-European speaking tribes of Gujarat, Western India. PLoS One 9(3):e90414PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Kumar V, Reddy AN, Babu JP, Rao TN, Langstieh BT, Thangaraj K, Reddy AG, Singh L, Reddy BM (2007) Y-chromosome evidence suggests a common paternal heritage of Austro-Asiatic populations. BMC EvolBiol 7:47View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Li H, Wen B, Chen SJ, Su B, Pramoonjago P, Liu Y, Pan S, Qin Z, Liu W, Cheng X, Yang N, Li X, Tran D, Lu D, Hsu MT, Deka R, Marzuki S, Tan CC, Jin L (2008) Paternal genetic affinity between Western Austronesians and Daic populations. BMC Evol Biol 8:146–158PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Narkuti V, Vellanki RN, Anubrolu N, Doddapaneni KK, Gandhi Kaza PC, Mangamoori LN (2008) Single and double incompatibility at vWA and D8S1179/D21S11 loci between mother and child: Implications in kinship analysis. Clinica Chimica Acta 395(1-2):162–165View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Phenol-chloroform isoamyl alcohol (PCI) DNA extraction. Modified from protocols by Barker et al (1998) Available at: http://ccoon.myweb.usf.edu/ecoimmunology.org/About_Home.html
  34. Pulker H, Lareu MV, Phillips C, Carracedo A (2007) Finding genes that underlie physical traits of forensic interest using genetic tools. Forensic Sci Int Genet 1:100–104PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Rajkumar R, Kashyap VK (2002) Distribution of alleles of 15 STR loci of the Powerplex™ 16 Multiplex system in four predominant population groups of South India. Forensic Science International 126(2):173–177PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Regueiro M, Cadenas AM, Gayden T, Underhill PA, Herrera RJ (2006) Iran: tricontinental nexus for Y-chromosome driven migration. Hum Hered 61:132–143PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Sahoo S, Kashyap VK (2002) Allele Frequency Data for Powerplex 16 Loci in Four Major Populations of Orissa, India. Journal of Forensic Sciences 47(4):912–915PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Sarkar N, Kashyap VK (2002) Genetic diversity at two pentanucleotide STR and thirteen tetranucleotide STR loci by multiplex PCR in four predominant population groups of central India. Forensic Science International 128(3):196–201PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Sengupta S, Zhivotovsky LA, King R, Mehdi SQ, Edmonds CA, Chow CT, Lin AA, Mitra M, Sil SK, Ramesh A, Usha Rani MV, Thakur CM, Cavalli-Sforza LL, Majumder PP, Underhill PA (2006) Polarity and temporality of high-resolution y-chromosome distributions in India identify both indigenous and exogenous expansions and reveal minor genetic influence of Central Asian pastoralists. Am J Hum Genet 78:202–221PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Sharma G, Tamang R, Chaudhary R, Singh VK, Shah AM, Anugula S, Rani DS, Reddy AG, Eaaswarkhanth M, Chaubey G, Singh L, Thangaraj K (2012) Genetic affinities of the central Indian tribal populations. PLoS One 7(2):e32546PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Shrivastava P, Jain T, Gupta U, Trivedi VB (2015) Genetic polymorphism study on 12 X STR locus of investigator Argus X STR kit in Bhil tribal population of Madhya Pradesh, India. Legal Med 17:214–217PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Shrivastava P, Jain T, Gupta U, Trivedi VB (2016) Genetic variation at 15 autosomal STR locus in Bhil tribal population of Central India. Ann Hum Biol 43(1):81–84. https://doi.org/10.3109/03014460.2015.1014419 Epub 2015 Apr 24PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Singh S, Singh A, Rajkumar R, Kumar KS, Samy SK, Nizamuddin S, Singh A, Sheikh SA, Peddada V, Khanna V, Veeraiah P, Pandit A, Chaubey G, Singh L, Thangaraj K (2016) Dissecting the influence of Neolithic demic diffusion on Indian Y-chromosome pool through J2-M172 haplogroup. Sci Rep 6:19157. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19157 Published online 12 Jan 2016. PMCID: PMC4709632; PMID: 26754573PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Sinha M, Rao AI, Mitra M (2017) Y-Chromosomal and Mitochondrial SNP Haplogroup Distribution in Indian Populations and its Significance in Disaster Victim Identification (DVI)-A Review Based Molecular Approach. Austin Journal of Forensic Science and. Criminology. 4(1)Google Scholar
  45. Sobrino B, Brión M, Carracedo A (2005) SNPs in forensic genetics: a review on SNP typing methodologies. Forensic Sci Int 154:181–194PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Su B, Xiao J, Underhill P, Deka R, Zhang W, Akey J, Wei (1999) Y-chromosome evidence for a northward migration of modern humans into eastern Asia during the last Ice Age. Am J Hum Genet 65:1718–1724PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Tandon BN (2002) Liver disease history in India. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology 17(s4):S504–S505PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Thomson R, Pritchard JK, Shen P, Oefner PJ, Feldman MW (2000) Recent common ancestry of human Y chromosomames: evidence from DNA sequence data. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97(13):7360–7365PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Underhill PA, Passarino G, Lin AA, Shen P, Mirazon LM, Foley RA, Oefner PJ, Cavalli-Sforza LL (2001) The phylogeography of Y chromosome binary haplotypes and the origins of modern human populations. Ann Hum Genet 65:43–62PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Vikrant K, Arimanda NSR, Jagedeesh PB, Tipirisetti NR, Banrida TL, Kumarasamy T, Alla GR, Lalji S, Battini MR (2007) Y-chromosome evidence suggests a common paternal heritage of Austro-Asiatic populations. BMC Evol Biol 7:47. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-7-47 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Wang DG, Fan JB, Siao CJ, Berno A, Young P, Sapolsky R, Ghandour G, Perkins N, Winchester E, Spencer J, Kruglyak L, Stein L, Hsie L, Topaloglou T, Hubbell E, Robinson E, Mittmann M, Morris MS, Shen N, Kilburn D, Rioux J, Nusbaum C, Rozen S, Hudson TJ, Lander ES et al (1998) Large-scale identification, mapping, and genotyping of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the human genome. Science 280:1077–1082PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Wells RS, Yuldasheva N, Ruzibakiev R, Underhill PA, Evseeva I, Blue-Smithd J, Jinf L, Suf B, Pitchappang R, Shanmugalakshmig S, Balakrishnang K, Readh M, Pearsoni NM, Zerjalj T, Websterk MT, Zholoshvilil I, Jamarjashvilil E, Gambarovm S, Nikbinn B, Dostievo A, Aknazarovp O, Zallouaq P, Tsoyr I, Kitaevs M, Mirrakhimovs M, Charievt A, Bodmer WF (2001) The Eurasian heartland: a continental perspective on Y-chromosome diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:10244–10249PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Y Chromosome Consortium (2002) A nomenclature system for the tree of human Y-chromosomal binary haplogroups. Genome Res 12:339–348View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhao Z, Khan F, Borkar M, Herrera R, Agrawal S (2009) Presence of three different paternal lineages among North Indians: a study of 560 Y chromosomes. Ann Hum Biol 36:46–59PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Zupanic Pajnic I, Sterlinko H, Bala ic J, Komel R (2001) Parentage testing with 14 STR loci and population data for 5 STRs in the Slovenian population. Int J Legal Med. 114(3):178–180PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Zupanič Pajnič I, Gornjak Pogorelc B, Balažic J (2010) Molecular genetic identification of skeletal remains from the Second World War Konfin I mass grave in Slovenia. International Journal of Legal Medicine 124(4):307–317PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2019

Advertisement