- Case Report
- Open Access
Sub-occipital ligature knot in a case of long drop suicidal hanging with rare autopsy finding of cervical spine fracture
© The Author(s) 2018
- Received: 18 October 2017
- Accepted: 26 March 2018
- Published: 3 April 2018
Hangman’s fracture (Fracture of cervical vertebrae) in hanging is usually described into the context of judicial type of hanging where the individual is dropped from a calculated height with sub-mental or sub-aural position of ligature knot. Such a long drop with typical upper cervical vertebral fracture is a rare entity in a case of suicidal hanging.
We have described such a case where an average built deceased weighing 62 kg hang himself with a nylon rope by jumping from a branch of tree with a drop length of 6.3 m, which was sufficiently long enough to cause soft tissue injuries, transection of larynx along with fracture and dislocation of cervical spine at C2-C3 level contrary to the fact that position of ligature knot was in sub-occipital area. Hence, this rare case is discussed with reference to the probable mechanism involved in causation of such internal injuries.
In our case of long drop hanging, we found fracture of cervical spine when ligature knot was placed at sub-occipital position which is a rare autopsy finding. We also noticed deep laceration of skin and transection of larynx as extremely rare finding in hanging caused by flexible and blunt nylon rope used as ligature material.
- Hangman’s fracture
- Long drop
Hanging is a form of death due to constriction of the neck when the force applied is derived from the gravitational drag of the victim’s body weight (DiMaio and DiMaio 2001; http://ncrb.nic.in/StatPublications/CII/CII2015/FILES/Statistics-2015.rev11.pdf). Among all the modes, hanging is the most common method of committing suicide in India according to recent data published by national crime records bureau, government of India (Sauko and Knight 2004).
In most of cases of suicidal hanging, cause of death is due to compression of vasculature and airway. Injury to upper cervical spine, usually at the level of C1-C2 and C2-C3 are mostly seen in judicial type of hanging, wherein the body falls from a sufficient distance before suspension (Dolinak and Matshes 2005; Hejna and Bohnert 2013). Hangman’s fracture as described by Wood Jones in 1913 involves fracture-dislocation of the 2nd cervical vertebra as a result of hyperextension and distraction of the neck (Wood-Jones 1913). If the length of drop is several meters, more profound injuries like decapitation (complete/incomplete) can occur (Rothschild and Schneider 1999). Hence, in judicial hanging drop length is calculated according to the height and weight of the individual to prevent decapitation.
Body weight, falling distance and nature of ligature material (elastic/inelastic) are the most important factors in the patho-mechanism of decapitation in long drop suspension (Byard and Gilbert 2017). When a moving body falls with noose around neck, it causes injuries to cervical structures through additional axial traction (deceleration force) and radial shearing forces of the tightening noose. Hence, in hanging cases with long-drop, the structures of the neck are injured by strain caused by increased gravitational drag produced by the body’s weight.
Herewith we are discussing a case of long drop suicidal hanging by using nylon rope as ligature material with sub-occipital position of knot and atypical autopsy findings of fracture-dislocation of upper cervical vertebra as position of the knot was unfavorable to cause such injuries.
Height & weight of deceased was 158 cm & 62 kg, respectively. Eyes were partially open with haziness in corneas. Tongue was found to be clinched in between teeth’s. Marks of dried salivary stains caused due to dribbling of saliva were present over chin and upper part of shirt in midline. Rigor mortis was well marked in the whole body. Fixed gloves and stocking type of post mortem lividity was present.
Suicide by long drop hanging is a rare occurrence. These are usually ‘short-drops,’ and the total distance of the drop is less than 0.6–0.9 m. It is uncommon for suicidal hanging to involve a ‘long-drop’ in which the descent is between 4.3 and 5.2 m (Hellier and Connolly 2009).
A fall with a noose around the neck is associated with frequent injuries involving local structures as a result of axial traction and radial shearing forces. Victims although suffer a wide range of soft tissue injuries, fracture of the cervical spine along with spinal cord injuries are unusual in routine hanging. Exact incidence of cervical bony injury following suicidal hanging is not known, and has been observed different in different surveys. But when they occur, they tend to be described with reference to judicial hanging in which the body falls some distance before suspension (Dolinak and Matshes 2005). Long drop suspension, most typified by judicial execution is meant to result in fracture of C2 and C3 rather than obstruction of vasculature and airway (Thierauf and Pollak 2008). Typical “Hangman’s fracture” i.e. bilateral fracture of C2 with anterior sublaxation or dislocation of the body due to hyperextension of the neck can be seen in such long drops only (Hellier and Connolly 2009). Fractures may also occur between cervical vertebrae 1–2 or 3–4 (Toro et al 2008; Dedouit et al. 2007). Although, hyperextension has been described by majority of authors as the most common neck movement for causing fracture-dislocation, ante-flexion was also found by few (Zhu et al. 2000). Nikolic & Zivkovic reported cervical spine injury in a cases of hanging without long-drop pattern with a frequency 3.27% (Nikolic and Zivkovic 2014). But, in his series all the victims were old aged with severe osteoporotic changes in bones.
If the drop is sufficiently high, it may result in even more profound injuries such as decapitation. When a narrow wire is used, it may lacerate the soft tissue of neck even without a long drop (cheese cutter method). Occurrence of complete or incomplete decapitation can increase by the increasing energy stored as potential energy at the starting position and the characteristics of the rope extended by the hanging body (Toro et al 2008). Such energy can be stored by changing the position in the gravitational field, by changing the shape of the hanging rope and by changing the motion of the hanging body. In a biomechanical experiment, it was found that traction-forces of about 12,000 Newton lead to complete decapitation irrespectively of the diameter of the used halter (Rabl et al. 1995).
In the present case, the deceased felt down from a distance of 6.3 m before suspension and constriction by the rope. Usually, in such long drops, there is every chance of partial or complete decapitation due to traction force. However, there was laceration of skin over the antero-lateral aspect of the neck along with transection of larynx. This rare occurrence in such long drop can be described by the weight of the individual and nature (thick and elastic) of the ligature material. The deceased was an average built person with body weight 62 kg, which was insufficient to cause enough gravitational drag, thus preventing decapitation even after sufficient traction.
Fracture of cervical spine in long drop suicidal hanging with sub-mental or sub-aural position of ligature knot is scientifically proven autopsy findings. However, in our case of long drop hanging, we found fracture of cervical spine when ligature knot was in sub-occipital position as a rare autopsy findings. We also noticed deep laceration of skin and transection of larynx as extremely rare finding caused by flexible and blunt nylon rope used as ligature. Hence, further study is required regarding exact patho-mechanism of such incidences to peer deep into such rare occurrences.
We sincerely acknowledge constant support and guidance provided by Dr.A.N.Keoliya, Professor and Head Dept. of Forensic Medicine, IGGMC Nagpur.
We wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.
Availability of data and materials
We do not wish to share our data as references are cited in our case paper.
We confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors and that there are no other persons who satisfied the criteria for authorship but are not listed. We further confirm that the order of authors listed in the manuscript has been approved by all of us. We understand that the Corresponding Author is the sole contact for the Editorial process (including Editorial Manager and direct communications with the office). He is responsible for communicating with the other authors about progress, submissions of revisions and final approval of proofs. We confirm that we have provided a current, correct email address which is accessible by the Corresponding Authors and which has been configured to Accept email from firstname.lastname@example.org
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publishing data collected during medico-legal autopsy has been accorded by investigating officer and relatives of the deceased. Institutional ethics committee of IGGMC, Nagpur had reviewed our case paper and approved it as there is no disclosure of identity of any individual.
Consent for publication
In our case paper, images used are entirely unidentifiable and data described in manuscript does not disclose identity of any individual. Although consent for publication is taken from investigating officer and relatives of the deceased.
We confirm that we have read Springer Opens Guidelines on competing interests and we declare that none of us have any competing interests in the submitted manuscript.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
- Byard RW, Gilbert JD (2017) Suicidal decapitation by hanging-a population-based study. J Forensic Sci:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13638.
- Dedouit F, Tournet G, Becart A, Hedouin V, Gosset D (2007) Suicidal hanging resulting in complete decapitation – forensic, radiological, and anthropological studies: a case report. J Forensic Sci 52(5):1190–1193View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- DiMaio DJ, DiMaio D (2001) Forensic pathology. CRC Press LLC, New York, pp 229–277Google Scholar
- Dolinak D, Matshes EW (2005) Asphyxia- forensic pathology principles and practice, 4th edn. Elsevier Academic Press, London, pp 149–176Google Scholar
- Hejna P, Bohnert M (2013) Decapitation in suicidal hanging: vital reaction patterns. J Forensic Sci 58(1):270–277View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hellier C, Connolly R (2009) Cause of death in judicial hanging: a review and case study. Med Sci Law 49:18–26View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nikolic S, Zivkovic V (2014) Cervical spine injuries in suicidal hanging without a long drop-patterns and possible underlying mechanisms of injury: an autopsy study. Forensic Sci Med Path 10(2):193–197View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rabl W, Haid C, Katzgraber F, Walser B (1995) Hanging with decapitation: case report—biomechanics. Arch Kriminol 195(1–2):31–37PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rothschild MA, Schneider V (1999) Decapitation as a result of suicidal hanging. Forensic Sci Int 106(1):55–62View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sauko P, Knight B (2004) Knight’s forensic pathology. Edward Arnold Publishers Ltd, London, pp 368–393Google Scholar
- Thierauf A, Pollak S (2008) Strangulation (chapter) in: forensic pathology. First edition academic press- Elsevier; 2017:143.Google Scholar
- Toro K, Kristof I, Keller E. Incomplete decapitation in suicidal hanging–report of a case and review of the literature. J Forensic Legal Med 15(3):180–184Google Scholar
- Wood-Jones F (1913) The ideal lesion produced by judicial hanging. Lancet 181(4662):53View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhu B, Quan L, Ishida K, Oritani S, Taniguchi M (2000) Decapitation in suicidal hanging--a case report with a review of the literature. Legal Med 2(3):159–152View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar