Psychopathy and proclivity to accept rape myths as predictors of negative attitudes towards victims of rape: the moderating role of narcissism

Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences

Table 4 Multivariate analysis of mean differences with regard to rape-related attitudes, rape myths acceptance, and primary psychopathy

Source	Dependent variable	df	MS	F	P	Partial η²
Gender	Attitudes towards rape victims	1	2.60	0.10	0.919	.00
	Rape myths acceptance	1	1403.40	7.18	.000	.01
	Primary psychopathy	1	6097.99	17.70	.000	.04
Liberal vs. conservative orientation	Attitudes towards rape victims	1	5375.66	21.35	.000	.04
	Rape myths acceptance	1	2473.08	12.67	.000	.03
	Primary psychopathy	1	1034.91	3.00	.000	.04
Gender × liberal vs. conservative orientation	Attitudes towards rape victims	1	50.87	0.20	.084	.00
	Rape myths acceptance	1	80.32	0.41	0.65	.00
	Primary psychopathy	1	1621.90	4.70	0.52	.01
Error	Attitudes towards rape victims	411	251.79	2.20	0.12	.00
	Rape myths acceptance	411	195.19
	Primary psychopathy	411	344.445

For gender, Wilk’s λ (3, 409) = 0.94, p = .000, η² = .05. For liberal vs. conservative orientation Wilk’s λ (3, 409) = 0.94, p = .000, η² = .05 and for interaction Wilk’s λ (3, 409) = 0.98, p = 0.118, η² = .01