Skip to main content

Table 3 Spearman correlation analysis between chronological age, estimated age, and stages of tooth development

From: Applicability of Willems method for age estimation in Brazilian children: performance of multiple linear regression and artificial neural network

Sex

Correlations

 

CA

EA

#31

#32

#33

#34

#35

#36

#37

F

CA

1.000

        

EA

0.941**

1.000

       

#31

0.646**

0.658**

1.000

      

#32

0.779**

0.792**

0.816**

1.000

     

#33

0.871**

0.910**

0.648**

0.781**

1.000

    

#34

0.910**

0.955**

0.630**

0.776**

0.876**

1.000

   

#35

0.898**

0.952**

0.617**

0.753**

0.855**

0.926**

1.000

  

#36

0.791**

0.809**

0.756**

0.916**

0.796**

0.782**

0.767**

1.000

 

#37

0.912**

0.967**

0.608**

0.763**

0.850**

0.898**

0.901**

0.779**

1.000

M

CA

1.000

        

EA

0.945**

1.000

       

#31

0.714**

0.730**

1.000

      

#32

0.807**

0.837**

0.828**

1.000

     

#33

0.902**

0.953**

0.702**

0.791**

1.000

    

#34

0.915**

0.961**

0.687**

0.801**

0.914**

1.000

   

#35

0.902**

0.952**

0.684**

0.791**

0.893**

0.940**

1.000

  

#36

0.809**

0.835**

0.803**

0.893**

0.791**

0.806**

0.800**

1.000

 

#37

0.917**

0.968**

0.680**

0.792**

0.893**

0.919**

0.922**

0.795**

1.000

  1. F females, M males, CA chronological age, EA estimated age
  2. ** p < 0.001 (2-tailed); #31–37: permanent mandibular left central incisor, lateral incisor, canine, first premolar, second premolar, first molar and second molar. Tooth positions described according to the notation system of the Fédération Dentaire Internationale (FDI)