Table 7 Description of included studies
From: Applicability of the mandibular canine index for sex estimation: a systematic review
Study | Subjects | Age (years) | Tooth | Studied material | Examiners | Origin population |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Acharya and Mainali 2009 | 123 (M = 65 and F = 58) | 19–28 | 33 and 43 | Plaster models | –a | Nepal |
Acharya et al. 2011 | 205 (M = 103 and F = 102) | 19–32 | 33 and 43 | Plaster models | –a | India |
Anu et al. 2018 | 150 (M = 75 and F = 75) | 18–22 | 13, 23, 33 and 43 | In situ | –a | India |
Atreya et al. 2019 | 80 (M = 40 and F = 40) | –ª | 33 and 43 | Plaster models | one | Nepal |
Azevedo et al. 2019 | 120 (M = 50 and F = 70) | 16–30 | 33 and 43 | Plaster models | –a | Portugal |
Bai et al. 2018 | 300 (M = 150 and F = 150) | 18–25 | 33 and 43 | Plaster models | –a | –a |
Bakkannavar et al. 2015 | 500 (M = 250 and F = 250) | 15–25 | 13, 23, 33 and 43 | In situ | –a | India |
Dhakar et al. 2012 | 150 (M = 75 and F = 75) | 14–20 | 33 and 43 | Plaster models | –a | India |
Divyadharsini and Kumar 2019 | 100 (M = 50 and F = 50) | 19–26 | 33 and 43 | In situ | –a | India |
Duraiswamy et al. 2009 | 145 | 14–15 | 33 and 43 | Plaster models | two | India |
Gandhi et al. 2017 | 62 (M = 31 and F = 31) | 15–25 | 33 and 43 | Plaster models | one | India |
Gargano et al. 2014 | 1000 (M = 501 e F = 499) | 18–60 | 13, 23, 33 and 43 | Plaster models | one | Uruguay |
Grover et al. 2013 | 80 (M = 40 and F = 40) | 18–20 | 33 and 43 | In situ | two | India |
Gupta et al. 2014 | 60 (M = 30 and F = 30) | 15–25 | 33 and 43 | Plaster models | –a | India |
Gupta and Daniel 2016 | 106 (M = 53 and F = 53) | 18–25 | 33 and 43 | Plaster models | –a | India |
Hosmani et al. 2013 | 100 (M = 50 and F = 50) | 15–21 | 33 and 43 | Plaster models | one | India |
Ibeachu et al. 2012 | 300 (M = 150 and F = 150) | 18–30 | 33 and 43 | In situ | –a | Nigeria |
Iqbal et al. 2015 | 216 (M = 107 and F = 109) | 18–25 | 33 and 43 | Plaster models | two | China |
Jacob et al. 2018 | 1000 (M = 500 and F = 500) | 18–25 | 33 and 43 | Plaster models | two | India |
Kakkar et al. 2013 | 250 (M = 175 and F = 175) | 17–25 | 33 and 43 | Plaster models | –a | India |
Kaushal et al. 2003 | 60 (M = 30 and F = 30) | 17–21 | 33 and 43 | In situ and plaster models | –ª | India |
Kaushal et al. 2004 | 60 (M = 30 and F = 30) | 17–21 | 33 and 43 | In situ | –a | India |
Krishnan et al. 2016 | 50 (M = 25 and F = 25) | 18–25 | 33 and 43 | Plaster models | –a | India |
Kumawat et al. 2017 | 300 (M = 150 and F = 150) | 17–25 | 33 and 43 | Plaster models | one | India |
Lagos et al. 2016 | 150 (M = 65 and F = 85) | 18–24 | 33 and 43 | Plaster models | –a | Chile |
Latif et al. 2016 | 150 (M = 75 and F = 75) | 17–40 | 33 and 43 | Plaster models | –a | India |
Mohsenpour et al. 2017 | 100 (M = 50 and F = 50) | 18–35 | 13, 23, 33 and 43 | In situ | –a | Iran |
Muhamedagić and Sarajlić 2013 | 180 (M = 90 and F = 90) | –ª | 33 and 43 | In situ | –a | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Muller et al. 2001 | 424 (M = 214 and F = 210) | –ª | 33 and 43 | In situ | ten | France |
Muthukumar and Thenmozhi 2018 | 50 (M = 25 and F = 25) | 18–25 | 33 and 43 | In situ | –a | India |
Nadendla et al. 2016 | 120 (M = 60 and F = 60) | 20–30 | 33 and 43 | In situ and radiography | –a | India |
Nagalaxmi et al. 2014 | 60 (M = 30 and F = 30) | 20–30 | 33 and 43 | In situ and | two | –a |
Narang et al. 2014 | 410 (M = 200 and F = 210) | 20–40 | 33 and 43 | plaster models | one | India |
Otuaga and Chris-Ozoko 2012 | 200 (M = 100 and F = 100) | 17–21 | 33 and 43 | In situ | –a | Nigeria |
Paramkusam et al. 2014 | 120 (M = 60 and F = 60) | 18–25 | 13, 23, 33 and 43 | In situ and plaster models | one | India |
Patel et al. 2017 | 400 (M = 200 and F = 200) | 21–40 | 33 and 43 | In situ and Plaster models | three | India |
Patil et al. 2015 | 200 | 15–50 | 13, 23, 33 and 43 | In situ | –a | India |
Priyadharshini et al. 2018 | 100 (M = 50 and F = 50) | 20–25 | 33 and 43 | In situ | two | India |
Rajarathnam et al. 2016 | 200 (M = 100 and F = 100) | 18–25 | 33 and 43 | In situ and Plaster models | –a | India |
Rao et al. 1989 | 766 (M = 382 and F = 384) | 15–21 | 33 and 43 | In situ | two | India |
Reddy et al. 2008 | 200 (M = 100 and F = 100) | 17–25 | 33 and 43 | Plaster models | –a | India |
Sassi et al. 2012 | 112 (M = 56 and F = 56) | 21–60 | 33 and 43 | Plaster models | one | Uruguay |
Shahid et al. 2018 | 128 (M = 64 and F = 64) | 18–24 | 33 | Plaster models | >one | Pakistan |
Sharma and Gorea 2010 | 177 | 17–50 | 13, 23, 33 and 43 | Plaster models | –a | India |
Sherfudhin et al. 1996 | 301 (M = 150 and F = 151) | 14–17 | 13, 23, 33 and 43 | In situ | One | India |
Silva et al. 2016 | 120 (M = 50 and F = 70) | 16–30 | 33 and 43 | Plaster models | Two | Portugal |
Singh et al. 2012 | 60 (M = 30 and F = 30) | 20–25 | 33 and 43 | Plaster models | –a | India |
Singh et al. 2015 | 100 (M = 45 and F = 55) | 20–30 | 33 and 43 | Plaster models | two | India |
Sreedhar et al. 2015 | 60 (M = 30 and F = 30) | 19–30 | 33 and 43 | Plaster models | –a | India |
Srivastava 2010 | 400 (M = 200 and F = 200) | 17–21 | 33 and 43 | In situ | two | India |
Vijayan et al. 2019 | 100 (M = 50 and F = 50) | 18–25 | 33 and 43 | Plaster models | one | India |
Vishwakarma and Guha 2011 | 180 (M = 90 and F = 90) | 17–23 | 33 and 43 | In situ | –a | India |
Yadav et al. 2002 | 360 (M = 180 and F = 180) | 15–21 | 33 and 43 | Plaster models | –a | India |