Skip to main content

Table 6 Logistic regression analysis of predictive factors for FGM approval

From: Awareness of different forms of child abuse among Beni Suef University students: descriptive survey

 

OR

95% CI

P value

Simple logistic regression analysis

 Type of college

  Health science colleges

Ref.

  

  Non-health science

1.56

1.05–2.31

0.028

 Sex

  Female

Ref.

  

  Male

2.08

1.41–3.06

< 0.001

 Residence

  Urban

Ref.

 

< 0.001

  Rural

3.2

2.03–5.04

 

 Father education

  College

Ref.

  

  High school

1.33

0.85–2.09

0.208

  Elementary school

2.2

1.31–3.68

0.003

 Mother education

  College

Ref.

  

  High school

2.07

1.21–3.54

0.008

  Elementary school

3.22

1.89–5.47

< 0.001

Multiple logistic regression analysis

 Type of college

  Health science colleges

Ref.

  

  Non-health science

1.28

0.75–2.17

0.362

 Sex

  Female

Ref.

  

  Male

2.44

1.52–3.9

< 0.001

 Residence

  Urban

Ref.

  

  Rural

3.45

1.9–6.24

< 0.001

 Father education

  College

Ref.

  

  High school

0.65

0.35–1.2

0.167

  Elementary school

0.85

0.38–1.9

0.688

 Mother education

  College

Ref.

  

  High school

2.07

1.01–4.23

0.047

  Elementary school

2.17

0.92–5.13

0.076