Skip to main content

Table 3 The circumstance of assault and typology of violence studied according to the gender of the victims of non-fatal interpersonal violence

From: Descriptive study of non-fatal interpersonal violence in a Nigerian City

Variable*

Gender (victims)

Test statistic

Female

Male

Total

Count (%)

Count (%)

Count (%)

Circumstance of assault

CRQ

53 (56.4)

28 (22.2)

81 (36.8)

χ2(5) = 34.4

P < 0.001

BWR

17 (18.1)

53 (42.1)

70 (31.8)

BSE

5 (5.3)

13 (10.3)

18 (8.2)

FDR

12 (12.8)

10 (7.9)

22 (10.0)

LD

1 (1.1)

7 (5.60

8 (3.6)

Others

6 (6.4)

15 (11.9)

21 (9.5)

Total

94 (100.0)

126 (100.0)

220 (100.0)

Categorization of violence by WHO typology

CVA

73 (77.7)

73 (57.9)

146 (66.4)

Fisher’s exact; P < 0.001

CVS

9 (9.6)

41 (32.5)

50 (22.7)

IPV

4 (4.3)

1 (0.8)

5 (2.3)

FVNP

8 (8.5)

11 (8.7)

19 (8.6)

Total

94 (100.0)

126 (100.0)

220 (100.0)

  1. *CRQ, conflict in residential quarters; BWR, business and work related; BSE, bars and social events; FDR, family and dating related; LD, land dispute; CVA, community violence by acquaintance; CVS, community violence by stranger; IPV, intimate partner violence; FVNP, family violence by non-partner. School, church, street