Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of frame code and microchip labeling techniques in terms of features required in an ideal prosthetic labeling technique

From: Implementation of a prosthetic labelling process in implant-supported fixed prosthesis and comparison of two different methods: an in vitro study

Definition

QR code

Microchip

Longevity

The life of the label is directly proportional to the life of the material being labelled

Thermal cycle test successful

Aesthetic

acceptable

Very good

Feasibility

Applicable

Applicable

Data storage capacity

In 3 mm–3 mm sizes, 11 characters can be stored (Internet storage can be use via QR code link)

16,000 characters

Resistance to heat

Depending on the material being labelled

− 40/120° C

Cost

Required software and hardware = $28.571

Required software and hardware = $1428, $1.5 for each labelling

Unity

Very good

Very good

Biocompatibility

Further studies are necessary

Further studies are necessary

Surface roughness

No changes

No changes