Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of rugae shape among both sexes of Egyptian and Malaysian groups

From: A pilot- cross sectional study of palatal Rugae shape and direction among Egyptians and Malaysians

 

Egyptians

Malaysians

Mann-whitney U test

 

Males n = 30

Females n = 30

Males n = 30

Females n = 30

 

\( \tilde{x} \)

IQR

%

\( \tilde{x} \)

IQR

%

\( \tilde{x} \)

IQR

%

\( \tilde{x} \)

IQR

%

P1

P2

P3

P4

B

5

4

45.03

6

3

43.68

4

3

31.47

3

3

27.25

0.892

0.271

0.117

0.003a

C

2

3

23.93

3

2

22.53

4

4

30.46

4

4

29.44

0.702

0.970

0.029a

0.240

D

0

1

3.42

0

0

2.47

0

1

2.28

0

1

3.41

0.574

0.550

0.803

0.359

E

2

3

21.07

3

2

21.98

3

2

26.90

4

2

29.93

0.521

0.317

0.020a

0.005a

F

0

0

0.85

0

0

1.92

0

0

0

0

0

0.97

0.267

0.916

0.978

0.464

X

0

1

5.70

1

1

7.42

1

2

8.89

1

1

9

0.159

0.815

0.025a

0.191

  1. aSignificance at P < 0.05
  2. \( \tilde{\mathrm{x}} \): median
  3. IQR interquartile range
  4. B: line shaped rugae C: curve shaped rugae, D: angle shaped rugae, E: sinous shaped rugae, F: circle shaped rugae, X: complex shaped rugae
  5. P1 = p value of Egyptian males versus females
  6. P2 = p value of Malaysian males versus females
  7. P3 = p value of Egyptian males versus Malaysian males
  8. P4 = p value of Egyptian females versus Malaysian females